Hozi

Hozi v. Social Security Administrative SSA

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20233:23-cv-00031California789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUZAN HOZI, Case No.: 23-CV-31-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER, Defendant. 16

18 Plaintiff files for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the Complaint. (Doc. No. 2.) The Court reviews Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), as required when a plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court finds the Complaint sufficiently states a claim for relief, but that Plaintiff’s instant motion fails to show an inability to pay the filing fee. Thus, the Court DENIES the IFP motion. I. MOTION FOR IFP Plaintiff moves to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.