Carpio

Carpio v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20233:22-cv-01037California1,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 Case No.:22CV1037-RBM(BLM) DAVID ALEXANDER CARPIO,

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

REQUEST FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME

v. TO OPPOSE RESPONDENT’S MOTION

TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION

JAMES HILL,

TO OBTAIN LODGMENT DOCUMENTS

Respondent. THAT RESPONDENT SUBMITTED TO

COURTS

11 [ECF Nos. 14 & 14-1]

13 Currently before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to File 14 Opposition to Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 14] and Petitioner’s Motion to Obtain 15 Lodgment Documents that Respondent Submitted to Courts [ECF No. 14-1]. As further 16 discussed below, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s motion for enlargement of time and DENIES 17 Petitioner’s motion for copies of lodgment documents. 18 A. Background 19 On July 14, 2022, Petitioner filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”). ECF 20 No. 1. On July 19, 2022, the Court issued an Order Requiring Response to Petition (28 U.S.C. 21 § 2254). ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.