Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Maxlinear, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20233:22-cv-01178California4,113 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 BELL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC, Case No.: 22-cv-01178-H-KSC 12 Consolidated for Pretrial Purposes with Plaintiff, Lead Case No.: 22-cv-00594-H-KSC v.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

MAXLINEAR, INC.,

MAXLINEAR’S RULE 12(b)(6) Defendant. MOTION TO DISMISS

[Doc. No. 14.]

18 On November 10, 2022, Defendant MaxLinear, Inc. (“MaxLinear”) filed a motion 19 to dismiss Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC (“Bell Semic”)’s first amended complaint 20 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 21 14.) On November 28, 2022, Bell Semic filed a response in opposition to MaxLinear’s 22 motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 15.) On December 5, 2022, MaxLinear filed a reply. (Doc. 23 No. 17.) The Court, pursuant to its discretion under Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), determines 24 the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument and decides the motion on 25

27 All citations in this order are to the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.