Bennett

Mitchell v. Bennett

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20233:22-cv-01011California2,701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENYATTA QUINN MITCHELL Case No.: 3:22-cv-01011-DMS-MDD

CDCR # BC0837,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) vs. AND § 1915A(b)(1)

15 PAUL BENNETT, Chula Vista Parole 16 Agent; JANE DOE, Chula Vista Parole Agent; CLAUDIA PLASCENCIA, District Attorney; BONNIE DUMANIS, 18 District Attorney; PATRICIA TAITANO VALDOVINOS, San Diego Public Defender; ANGEL NUNEZ, Probation 20 Officer; BETHANY HOGGE, Probation Officer,

22 Defendants. 23 Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell (“Plaintiff” or “Mitchell”), an inmate currently incarcerated at Wasco State Prison (“WSP”), filed a Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), on July 12, 2022. See ECF Nos. 1–2. Then, on August 22, 2022, Mitchell filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), ECF No. 3, and on October 11, 2022, he filed a Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, and a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.