Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. NXP USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20233:22-cv-01267California6,406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 BELL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC, Case No.: 22-cv-01267-H-KSC 12 Consolidated for Pretrial Purposes with Plaintiff, Lead Case No.: 22-cv-00594-H-KSC v.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

NXP USA, INC.,

NXP’S RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO Defendant. DISMISS

[Doc. No. 24.]

18 On December 6, 2022, Defendant NXP USA, Inc. (“NXP”) filed a motion to dismiss 19 Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC (“Bell Semic”)’s first amended complaint pursuant to 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 24.) On 21 December 27, 2022, Bell Semic filed a response in opposition to NXP’s motion to dismiss. 22 (Doc. No. 29.) On January 3, 2023, NXP filed a reply. (Doc. No. 30.) The Court, pursuant 23 to its discretion under Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), determines the matter is appropriate for 24 resolution without oral argument and decides the motion on the parties’ papers. For the 25 reasons below, the Court denies NXP’s motion to dismiss.

27 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.