Peralta

Peralta v. Massachusetts State Police

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20233:23-cv-00022California2,092 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LIZBETH PERALTA, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00022-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE, et PAUPERIS; AND al., 15 Defendants. (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM;

AND

(2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL.

20 [Docs. 2, 3]

I. INTRODUCTION On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff Lizbeth Peralta (“Plaintiff”) filed an action against the Massachusetts State Police, TAP Airlines, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Francis Ford Coppola (“Defendants”). (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff alleges various civil rights violations and asserts that Defendants conspired to “harm Plaintiff [] sexually, economically, socially psychologically, and physically.” (Id. at 10.) Also on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (“IFP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.