Dunsmore

Dunsmore v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20233:20-cv-00406California3,159 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL DUNSMORE, et al., Case No.: 20-cv-00406-AJB-DDL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART

MOTION FOR EXPEDITED

SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DISCOVERY

DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 [Dkt. No. 243] 17 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Second Motion for Limited Expedited Discovery (the “Motion”). Dkt. No. 243. The Court has considered the parties’ moving papers, the applicable law, and the arguments of counsel during the January 9, 2023, hearing on the Motion. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are individuals who are or have been incarcerated at jails in San Diego County. See generally Dkt. No. 231 (the “Third Amended Complaint” or “TAC”). For themselves and on behalf of a putative class of incarcerated persons, they challenge the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.