Waryck

Waryck v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20233:22-cv-01096California1,467 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JAMES WARYCK and SANGAM Case No.: 22-cv-1096-L-MDD

SHETH,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE v. THEIR FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT AND STRIKING

THOR MOTOR COACH, INC., MIKE

AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No.

THOMPSON RECREATIONAL

15) VEHICLES, SANTA FE SPRINGS,

RELIABLE DELIVERY SERVICES,

[ECF No. 17] INC., and DOES 1–20, 13 Defendants. 14 The time for Plaintiffs to amend their complaint as a matter of right has passed and Defendants have not provided written consent to allow amendment. As such, Plaintiffs now seek leave of court to file their first amended complaint. (ECF No. 17); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. Defendants opposed, (ECF No. 18), and Plaintiffs replied, (ECF No. 19). The Court decides the matters on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion. 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.