Waryck
Waryck v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20233:22-cv-01096California1,467 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JAMES WARYCK and SANGAM Case No.: 22-cv-1096-L-MDD
SHETH,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE v. THEIR FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND STRIKING
THOR MOTOR COACH, INC., MIKE
AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No.
THOMPSON RECREATIONAL
15) VEHICLES, SANTA FE SPRINGS,
RELIABLE DELIVERY SERVICES,
[ECF No. 17] INC., and DOES 1–20, 13 Defendants. 14 The time for Plaintiffs to amend their complaint as a matter of right has passed and Defendants have not provided written consent to allow amendment. As such, Plaintiffs now seek leave of court to file their first amended complaint. (ECF No. 17); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. Defendants opposed, (ECF No. 18), and Plaintiffs replied, (ECF No. 19). The Court decides the matters on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion. 21 …