Salmen
Salmen v. Bryant
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN SALMEN, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01508-BAS-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING AS MOOT OFFICER BRYANT, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS
Defendants. TO REPLY; and 16 (2) GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT
21 [ECF Nos. 11, 12]
23 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Request for Order Directing Defendants to Reply (ECF No. 11) (“Plaintiff’s Motion”), filed December 27, 2022, and Defendants’ Ex Parte Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint (ECF No. 12) (“Defendants’ Motion”), filed December 30, 2022. Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dictates that where, as here, Defendants have timely waived service under Rule 4(d), their deadline to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint is within 60 days after the…