Suarez

Suarez v. Del Toro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20233:22-cv-00021California2,300 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA SUAREZ, Case No.: 22-CV-0021-GPC-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER CONDITIONALLY

v. GRANTING AMENDED MOTION

TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary, U.S.

EFFECTIVE THIRTY (30) DAYS

Department of the Navy, FROM ORDER Defendant. 16 [ECF No. 65] 17 Before the Court is a motion by Plaintiff Maria Suarez’s Counsel to withdraw as counsel. ECF No. 65. For the reasons that follow, the Court hereby CONDITIONALLY GRANTS the motion for leave to withdraw as counsel, effective thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. I. BACKGROUND Counsel asserts that in December 2021 Suarez retained the law firm Tully Rinckey, PLLC for the limited scope of opposing Defendant Carlos Del Toro’s motions to dismiss and to transfer venue. ECF No. 65 at 2. Around April 22, 2022—after Suarez’s case was transferred to this Court and dismissed with leave to amend, see ECF No. 28 (order granting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.