Scripps Health v. Nautilus Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20233:21-cv-01634California4,830 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCRIPPS HEALTH, Case No.: 21-CV-1634-AJB(WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING IN PART

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

DENYING IN PART WITH

NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY,

PREJUDICE JOINT MOTION TO

Defendant. TAKE DEPOSITIONS OF THIRD-

PARTY WITNESSES AFTER FACT

DISCOVERY CUT-OFF

17 [ECF No. 58] 18 19 On January 13, 2023, the Parties filed a Joint Motion to Take Depositions of Third Party Witnesses After Fact Discovery Cut-Off Due to Unavailability (“Joint Motion”). (ECF No. 58.) The Joint Motion requests the Court continue the fact discovery deadline to afford the Parties additional time to conduct six third-party witness deposition. Id. For the reasons set forth below, the Joint Motion is DENIED in part without prejudice and DENIED in part with prejudice. I. LEGAL STANDARD When determining whether it would be appropriate to modify a scheduling order, courts must abide by the standard…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.