Radcliffe

Radcliffe v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20233:20-cv-02431California2,027 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID MICHAEL R., Case No.: 20cv2431-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

FOLLOWING REMAND AND

Commissioner of Social Security, AWARD OF BENEFITS [Doc. No. 23] Defendant. 16 17 18 Before the Court is a Motion for Attorney’s Fees filed pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 406(b), seeking an award of fees for representing plaintiff in connection with an application for Social Security disability benefits which lead, on remand, to a decision in plaintiff’s favor and an award of past due benefits. [Doc. No. 23.] Plaintiff was served with the Motion and given the opportunity to oppose but did not do so. [Doc. No. 23, at pp. 2, 24.] At the Court’s request, defendant filed a Response to plaintiff’s Motion and does not oppose the request for fees. [Doc. No. 24.] …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.