Tanaka

Tanaka v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20233:20-cv-01229California2,116 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAMIKO T., Case No.: 20cv1229-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

FOLLOWING REMAND AND

Commissioner of Social Security, AWARD OF BENEFITS [Doc. No. 23] Defendant. 16 17 18 Before the Court is a Motion for Attorney’s Fees filed pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 406(b), seeking an award of fees for representing plaintiff in connection with an application for Social Security disability benefits which lead, on remand, to a decision in plaintiff’s favor and an award of past due benefits. [Doc. No. 23.] Plaintiff was served with the Motion and given the opportunity to oppose but did not do so. [Doc. No. 23, at pp. 2, 24.] Nor has defendant opposed the Motion. However, the Court notes that the Social Security Administration “has no direct interest in how…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.