Waters

Waters v. Vroom Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20233:22-cv-01191California3,929 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN WATERS, Case No.: 22-CV-1191 TWR (AGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION

VROOM INC.; and VROOM

AUTOMOTIVE, LLC,

(ECF No. 7) Defendants. 16

Presently before the Court is a Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendants Vroom Inc. and Vroom Automotive, LLC (collectively “Vroom” or “Defendants”) (ECF No. 7, “Mot.”), as well as Plaintiff Martin Waters’ Response in Opposition (ECF No. 10, “Opp’n”) and Defendants’ Reply in Support of the Motion (ECF No. 12, “Reply”). The Court held a hearing on the Motion on December 1, 2022. (See ECF No. 14.) Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments and the relevant law, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration. BACKGROUND Plaintiff entered into a written contract with Defendants for the purchase of a used vehicle in June 2020. (Mot.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.