Waters
Waters v. Vroom Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN WATERS, Case No.: 22-CV-1191 TWR (AGS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION
VROOM INC.; and VROOM
AUTOMOTIVE, LLC,
(ECF No. 7) Defendants. 16
Presently before the Court is a Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendants Vroom Inc. and Vroom Automotive, LLC (collectively “Vroom” or “Defendants”) (ECF No. 7, “Mot.”), as well as Plaintiff Martin Waters’ Response in Opposition (ECF No. 10, “Opp’n”) and Defendants’ Reply in Support of the Motion (ECF No. 12, “Reply”). The Court held a hearing on the Motion on December 1, 2022. (See ECF No. 14.) Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments and the relevant law, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration. BACKGROUND Plaintiff entered into a written contract with Defendants for the purchase of a used vehicle in June 2020. (Mot.…