Patton

Patton v. Rey

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20233:22-cv-02028California4,390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ARNOLD PATTON Case No.: 3:22-cv-02028-CAB-MDD Inmate No. 20948281,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 10 v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

ANTHONY REY, Interim Sheriff; PAUPERIS [ECF No. 2]; SONIA L. MANNING, Facility

Commander; MONTGOMERY, Chief

AND

Medical Officer; COUNTY OF SAN

DIEGO,

(2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) 17 18 Arnold Patton (“Plaintiff”), currently detained at the Vista Detention Facility (“VDF”) in Vista, California, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action when he filed his Complaint; instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.