Soe

Soe v. Progenity, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20233:20-cv-01683California11,843 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:20-cv-01683-RBM-AHG

IN RE PROGENITY, INC. SECURITIES

LITIGATION

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS THE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Doc. 52] 16 On November 15, 2021, Defendants Progenity, Inc., Harry Stylli, Eric d’Esparbes, Jeffrey Alter, John Bigalke, Jeffrey Ferrell, Brian L. Kotzin, Samuel Nussbaum, Lynne Powell, Piper Sandler & Co., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Raymond James & Associates, Inc., and BTIG, LLC (“Defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”). (Doc. 52.) On January 14, 2022, Plaintiffs Lin Shen, Lingjun Lin and Fusheng Lin (“Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition to the Motion. (Doc. 54.) Defendants filed a reply on February 22, 2022. (Doc. 55.) On August 10, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a Statement of Recent Authority. (Doc. 59.) After being granted leave to respond by …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.