Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. NXP USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20233:22-cv-01267California3,287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., Case No. 22-cv-0594-BAS-KSC Case No. 22-cv-1267-BAS-KSC Plaintiff, Case No. 22-cv-1527-BAS-KSC v. Case No. 22-cv-1794-BAS-KSC

NXP USA, INC.,

ORDER:

Defendant. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A

MANDATORY STAY OF

PLAINTIFF’S ’803

18 INFRINGEMENT CLAIM; and 19 (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR A STAY OF ALL

PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, Inc. (“Bell”) owns a portfolio of patents that relate to semiconductor-design technologies, including the Asserted Patents in the above-captioned matters: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,007,259 (the “’259 Patent”), 6,436,807 (the “’807 Patent”), 7,149,989 (the “’989 Patent”), 7,260,803 (the “’803 Patent”), 7,231,626 (the “’626 Patent”), and 7,396,760 (the “’760 Patent”) (defined previously as, “Asserted Patents”). Bell commenced …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.