Professional Solutions Insurance Company v. The Grove La Mesa, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20233:22-cv-01322California3,032 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS Case No.: 22-CV-01322-GPC-WVG

INSURANCE COMPANY,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, (1) DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE v. 14 (2) GRANTING REQUESTS FOR

THE GROVER LA MESA, INC; SEAN

JUDICIAL NOTICE PATRICK McDERMOTT; and DAVID

HYDE, [ECF Nos. 31 & 36] Defendants. DAVID HYDE, Cross-Complainant, 19 v.

PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS

INSURANCE COMPANY; HYBRID

PAYROLL, LLC DBA MS. MARY

STAFFING; THE GROVE LA MESA,

INC., SEAN PATRICK McDERMOTT, Cross-Defendants.

25 Cross-Defendants The Grove La Mesa, Inc. and Sean Patrick McDermott 26 (collectively “The Grove”) filed a motion to strike multiple paragraphs from David Hyde’s 27 cross-complaint. ECF No. 31. Hyde filed an opposition, ECF No. 36, to which The Grove replied, ECF No. 40. Hyde additionally filed a request for judicial notice. ECF No. 36-1. The Court finds that the matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.