United States Aviation Underwriters Inc. v. Aerospike Iron, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES AVIATION Case No.: 21-cv-758-GPC
UNDERWRITERS INC.,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX
Plaintiff, PARTE MOTION TO STAY v. 14 [ECF No. 55] AEROSPIKE IRON, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 On January 17, 2023, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant United States Aviation 18 Underwriters, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed an Objection to Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major’s 19 Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ Motion to Compel Production of 20 Documents. ECF No. 54 (objecting to ECF No. 53). That same day, Plaintiff and 21 Counterdefendant filed an Ex Parte Motion to Stay the Magistrate Judge’s Order. ECF 22 No. 55. Defendants and Counterclaimants Aerospike Iron, LLC and Charles Brandes 23 (“Defendants”) did not file notice of an intent to oppose the ex parte request, as required 24 by Chambers Rules. See Chambers Rules at 2 (“If a party intends to oppose the ex parte 25 motion, the party must immediately file a notice stating that the party intends to oppose 26 27 the ex parte motion…