Dorsey

Dorsey v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20233:20-cv-00843California3,244 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSIE DORSEY, Case No.: 20cv0843-JAH-MDD

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

v. GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

P. SHAKIBA,

JUDGMENT

Defendant. [ECF. No. 22] 16 Plaintiff Jessie Dorsey is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and informa pauperis (“IFP”). Mr. Dorsey brings a civil rights claim against Defendant Dr. Shakiba based on the doctor’s role in medical care that Plaintiff received while incarcerated. Plaintiff claims that Dr. Shakiba was deliberately indifferent to his medical needs, specifically related to a knee injury Plaintiff sustained while playing basketball at the Ronald J. Donovan State Prison (“RJD”). This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States Districted Judge John A. Houston pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 72.1(c) of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. judgment, filed August 23, 2022. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.