Orcasitas

Orcasitas v. Ko

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20233:21-cv-00143California2,522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOE TOMAS ORCASITAS, JR., Case No. 21-cv-143-MMA (RBB)

CDCR #J-36909,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND vs. JUDGMENT

[Doc. No. 63]

DOCTOR KO, M.D.,

Defendant. 16 17 On January 26, 2021, Plaintiff Joe Tomas Orcasitas, Jr., a California inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). On December 7, 2022, the Court granted summary judgment in Defendant’s favor. See Doc. No. 61. Plaintiff now moves for reconsideration of the Court’s Summary Judgment Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Doc. No. 63. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. DISCUSSION A. Legal Standard Where the Court’s ruling has resulted in a final judgment or order, as here, a motion for reconsideration may be based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.