Schneider
Schneider v. Molina
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 JULIE SCHNEIDER, Case No.: 22-cv-1666-CAB-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS
ALICIA MOLINA, et al, [Doc. Nos. 12, 13, 20] Defendants. 19 Plaintiff Julie Schneider filed this action, in pro se, on October 26, 2022, alleging the wrongful foreclosure of Plaintiff’s home at 9272 Brookside Circle, Spring Valley, CA (“the Property”). [Doc No. 1 at 1]. The complaint is largely unintelligible, but the Court gathers that Plaintiff’s grievances arise from Defendants’1 commencement of nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings on the Property. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that the promissory note used to create the loan for the home was allegedly “forged” and that Defendants
27 1 Plaintiff’s complaint does not distinguish between Defendants in her complaint, so any mention of 28 allegedly failed to deliver the deed. [Doc. No. 1 at 4]. There are no specific allegations 2 …