Schneider

Schneider v. Molina

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20233:22-cv-01666California767 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 JULIE SCHNEIDER, Case No.: 22-cv-1666-CAB-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS

ALICIA MOLINA, et al, [Doc. Nos. 12, 13, 20] Defendants. 19 Plaintiff Julie Schneider filed this action, in pro se, on October 26, 2022, alleging the wrongful foreclosure of Plaintiff’s home at 9272 Brookside Circle, Spring Valley, CA (“the Property”). [Doc No. 1 at 1]. The complaint is largely unintelligible, but the Court gathers that Plaintiff’s grievances arise from Defendants’1 commencement of nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings on the Property. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that the promissory note used to create the loan for the home was allegedly “forged” and that Defendants

27 1 Plaintiff’s complaint does not distinguish between Defendants in her complaint, so any mention of 28 allegedly failed to deliver the deed. [Doc. No. 1 at 4]. There are no specific allegations 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.