Roberts

Roberts v. Olson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20233:22-cv-01373California859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, Case No.: 22-CV-1373 JLS (BLM) Plante) ORDER DETERMINING THAT IN 13 || v. FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS 14 |} CARI OLSON, NML1917532, US Bank; PEAL NOT CONTINUE ON we Milles, Bank Manager; and U.S. ° (ECF Nos. 15, 19) Defendants. 17 Presently before the Court is the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal’s Referral Notice (Referral, ECF No. 19) requesting that this Court determine whether in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status should continue for Plaintiff-Appellant Tina Louise Roberts. See Referral at 1. Having thoroughly reviewed the matter, the Court DETERMINES that the appeal is frivolous and IFP status should not continue on appeal. A litigant who was previously permitted to proceed [FP may maintain such status on appeal unless the district court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith or finds that the party is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.