Baird

Baird v. Leidos, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20233:22-cv-00060California2,359 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN BAIRD, Case No.: 22-cv-0060-LL-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER

LEIDOS, INC.

DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND TO

Defendant. PRODUCE DOCUMENTS

16 [ECF 31] 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant filed a motion seeking to compel deposition testimony of Plaintiff, an order to refrain from improper objections, production of documents, and sanctions. (Doc. 31.) The testimony he seeks to compel are answers to 16 questions to which Plaintiff’s attorney instructed the Plaintiff not to respond. (See Doc. 31-8 at 2.1) Defendant seeks to compel production of responses to RFPs Nos. 6 and 35. (Id. at 15-19.) Defendant also seeks sanctions based on the objections made by Plaintiff’s counsel during the deposition. 26 27 28 (Doc. 31-1 at 16-17; Doc. 39 at 10.) Plaintiff agrees to allow a further deposition on questions 1-12 and 16. (Doc. 35 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.