Scott
Scott v. Emanuel
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20233:22-cv-01955California1,686 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN A. SCOTT, Case No.: 22-CV-1955-GPC-AGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS; SUA SPONTE
VICKIE EMANUEL AND SHERYL
DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR
TURCOTTE,
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants. AND FOR LACK OF SUBJECT
MATTER JURISDICTION; AND
DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT
COUNSEL AS MOOT
[Dkt. Nos. 2, 3]
19 On December 9, 2022, Plaintiff John A. Scott, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint 20 against Defendants Vickie Emanuel and Sheryl Turcotte. (Dkt. No. 1, Compl.) Plaintiff 21 concurrently filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 22 (“IFP”) and a motion to appoint counsel. (Dkt. Nos. 2-3.) For the reasons set forth 23 below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP, sua sponte DISMISSES the 24 action for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28…