McDonald

McDonald v. Circle K Stores, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20233:22-cv-00495California2,239 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIFFANY MCDONALD, Case No.: 22cv495-L-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

CIRCLE K STORES, INC., [ECF No. 7] Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court in this putative class action alleging wages and hours violations under California law is Plaintiff’s motion to remand to the action to State court. Defendant filed an opposition and Plaintiff replied. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. Plaintiff filed a complaint in State court asserting numerous California Labor Code violations and violation of California Business and Professions Code § 17200 on behalf of non-exempt employees of Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc. employed since January 1, 2021. (ECF No. 1-2 at 60, Second Am. Class Action Compl. (“Compl.”).) Plaintiff also filed this action pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act, Cal. Lab. Code § 2698 et seq. (“PAGA”). (Id. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.