Gastelum

Gastelum v. TJX Companies

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20233:21-cv-01435California1,951 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No.: 21CV1435-GPC(BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO ENFORCE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND

TJX COMPANIES dba HOMEGOODS

DENYING REQUEST FOR

SAN DIEGO,

SANCTIONS Defendant. 16 [REDACTED – ORIGINAL FILED UNDER SEAL]

18 [Dkt. No. 49.] 19 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to enforce settlement and for sanctions. (Dkt. No. 49.) Plaintiff filed a response. (Dkt. No. 53.) Defendant replied. (Dkt. No. 55.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to enforce settlement agreement and DENIES Defendant’s request for sanctions. Background On August 11, 2021, Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendant the TJX Companies Inc. (“Defendant”) for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.