Topete-Jasper
Topete-Jasper v. Kijakazi
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIZABETH TOPETE-JASPER, Case No.: 23-CV-125-WVG
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16
18 Plaintiff files for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the Complaint. (Doc. No. 3.) The Court reviews Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), as required when a plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court finds that the Complaint sufficiently states a claim for relief. For its lack of factual specificity, however, the Court DENIES the IFP motion without prejudice. The Court elaborates below. I. MOTION FOR IFP Plaintiff moves to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).…