Hernandez

Hernandez v. Hernandez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20233:22-cv-01203California592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLAUDIA ARIAS, an individual, Case No: 22-CV-1203-DMS-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX

v.

PARTE APPLICATION FOR

MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, an TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER individual; GEORGE TOBIN, an

individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 16 Defendants.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Claudia Arias’s ex parte application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) against Defendants Miguel Hernandez and George Tobin, restraining them against “effectuating, executing, or enforcing any eviction” against Plaintiff and her family from the property in litigation . . . 1917 Terrakappa Avenue, Spring Valley, CA 91977.” (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff alternatively requests a limited temporary restraining order to preserve the status quo pending further briefing. Defendants filed an opposition to the application. (ECF No. 30.) The Court takes the matter under submission without oral argument. /// I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.