CliniComp International, Inc. v. Cerner Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20233:17-cv-02479California8,957 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLINICOMP INTERNATIONAL, INC., Case No.: 17-cv-02479-GPC (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 285

CERNER CORPORATION,

Defendant. [Dkt. No. 124.] 16 On November 30, 2022, Defendant Cerner Corporation (“Cerner”) filed a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285. (Dkt. No. 124.) On December 16, 2022, Plaintiff CliniComp International, Inc. (“CliniComp”) filed a response in opposition to Cerner’s motion for attorney’s fees. (Dkt. No. 127.) On December 30, 2022, Cerner filed a reply. (Dkt. No. 130.) On February 2, 2023, the Court took the motion under submission. (Dkt. No. 132.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Cerner’s motion for attorney’s fees. I. BACKGROUND CliniComp is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,665,647 (“the ’647 Patent”) by assignment. (Dkt. No. 1, Compl.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.