Kalter
Kalter v. Keyfactor, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACQUELINE KALTER, Case No.: 21-cv-1707-L-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTION TO SEAL
v. [Dkt. Nos. 83, 88] KEYFACTOR, INC. et al., Defendants. 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to seal. Plaintiff filed the motion in compliance with the Court’s Chambers Rule III.G because Defendant designated the documents at issue as Highly Confidential under the Protective Order. Defendant timely filed a brief in support of sealing the documents. As set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion to seal but directs the parties to make limited redactions. I. LEGAL STANDARDS The public enjoys “a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). This longstanding principle “is ‘based on the need for federal courts, although independent—indeed, …