Yphantides

Yphantides v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20233:21-cv-01575California603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICHOLAS YPHANTIDES, an Case No.: 21cv1575-GPC(BLM) individual,

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

Plaintiff, FILE AMENDED DOCUMENTS v. AND RESCHEDULING HEARING

DATE

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a public 15 entity and DOES 1-10 inclusive, 16 Defendant.

18 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment where the 19 parties have wholly failed to cite to any exhibit numbers for each evidence that is cited in 20 their briefs, and most importantly in Defendant’s statement of undisputed material facts, 21 Plaintiff’s opposition to the statement of undisputed material facts, and Plaintiff’s 22 additional material facts and supporting evidence. 23 The undersigned civil chambers rules states, “[e]ach of the material fact shall be 24 followed by a reference to the supporting evidence. . . Separate statements assist the 25 Court in identification of the material facts as well as pinpointing the evidence that 26 proves those facts.” Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel’s Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.