Bulnes
Bulnes v. Suez WTS Services USA, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARTIN BULNES, individually, and on Case No.: 3:22-cv-01154-BAS-AHG behalf of other members of the general ORDER GRANTING JOINT public similarly situated,
MOTION TO CONTINUE
12 Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES 13 v. [ECF No. 21] 14 SUEZ WTS SERVICES USA, INC., et al., Defendants. 17 Before the Court is the parties’ second Stipulation and Joint Motion to Continue Scheduling Order Deadlines. ECF No. 21. The parties request a 45-day extension of the operative dates in the case schedule, including the fact discovery cut-off and the deadline for Plaintiff to file the motion for class certification. Id. Under Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b)(4), “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on the diligence…