Navarro

Navarro v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20233:22-cv-01105California1,227 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTURO NAVARRO, Case No.: 22cv1105-LL-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF

RECORD

COSTCO WHOLESALE

CORPORATION, et al., [ECF No. 13] Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Withdraw as Attorney of Record filed by Lawyers for Employee & Consumer Rights and attorney Elan Osterman, a.k.a. Lonny Osterman, counsel of record for Plaintiff Arturo Navarro (collectively, “Counsel”). ECF No. 13. Counsel requests leave to withdraw because Plaintiff’s “repeated and ongoing failure to communicate with counsel,” which has “rendered it unreasonably difficult for counsel to carry out his representation effectively.” ECF No. 13-1 at 2. The Motion was filed on December 2, 2022 [ECF No. 13], and no opposition has been filed. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.