Collier

Collier v. Collier

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20233:23-cv-00170California2,277 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IRINA COLLIER, Case No.: 23-CV-00170-DMS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. CHARLES WADE COLLIER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Complaint (ECF No. 1) along with a request to proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 2), a request for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3), a Motion for Writ of Mandamus (ECF No. 3), and an Emergency Application for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 4). For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s request to proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted, and the complaint is dismissed with prejudice. All pending motions are therefore denied as moot. / / / / / / / / / / / / 28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff and her claims are not new to the court system. The crux of Plaintiff’s claims in the federal court system appear to stem from two family law matters in California state court—a marital…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.