Ruffin

Ruffin v. Dudek and Associates

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20233:22-cv-00191California2,164 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIMONE RUFFIN, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00191-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING DUDEK AND DUDEK AND ASSOCIATES, INC. et

ASSOCIATES, INC.’S MOTION TO

al., COMPEL ARBITRATION [Doc. Defendants. 34];

(2) DENYING TEKSYSTEMS,

DUDEK AND ASSOCIATES, INC., INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL

18 ARBITRATION AS MOOT [Doc. Cross Claimant, 22]; v. 20 (3) DENYING TEKSYSTEMS, TEKSYSTEMS, INC., et al., INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR Cross Defendants. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 22 WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Doc. 17]; and

24 (4) STAYING CASE PENDING ARBITRATION

26 [Doc. 34] 27 28 BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed suit against Dudek on February 10, 2022, alleging various employment-related claims, including but not limited to violation of Title VII…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.