Cody

Cody v. Movado Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20233:23-cv-00015California335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ANNETTE CODY, individually and on Case No.: 3:23-cv-00015-H-KSC behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff(s), LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE v. BRIEF 12 MOVADO GROUP, Inc., a New York 13 corporation dba MOVADO.COM; and [Doc. No. 6.] DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant(s). 16 On January 20, 2023, Defendant Movado Group, Inc. (“Movado”) filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 5.) On February 3, 2023, the National Retail Federation (“NRF”) requested leave to file an amicus curiae brief in support of Movado’s pending motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 6.) Movado consented to NRF’s request and Plaintiff Annette Cody (“Plaintiff”) opposed it. (Id.) The Court notes that it is rare to receive an amicus brief at the district court level especially on a motion to dismiss where the pertinent question is whether the complaint contains “enough…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.