Roberts
Roberts v. Studio 15 Management
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-967-GPC(AGH)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS ON APPEAL
STUDIO 15 MANGENT, RUTH
RIVERIA, JOLINDA QUILTIA,
14 Defendants. [Dkt. No. 22.]
16 On August 18, 2022, the Court, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), sua sponte dismissed 17 Plaintiff’s amended complaint for failure to state a claim without leave to amend because 18 the complaint failed to present short and plain statements with legally relevant facts to 19 support a cause of action. (Dkt. No. 15.) On January 19, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of 20 appeal of the Court’s order. (Dkt. No. 21.) Concurrently, she also filed a motion for 21 leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal indicating she cannot pay the filing fee. 22 (Dkt. No. 22.) 23 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3) provides that 24 [a] party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district- 25 court action, . . . may proceed on appeal in forma…