Jack
Jack v. Ring LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRANDON JACK, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00544-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
REMAND
v. Re: Dkt. No. 16 RING LLC, Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is the motion to remand filed by Plaintiffs Brandon Jack and Jean Alda. Dkt. No. 16 (“Mot.”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs initially filed this putative class action against Defendant Ring LLC on November 19, 2020, in San Francisco Superior Court. See Dkt. No. 1, Ex. A (“Compl.”). Defendant manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells Ring video doorbells and Ring security cameras. Id. at ¶ 15. Both the doorbell and security camera integrate with a smartphone “app,” allowing users to view real-time and video recordings. See id. at ¶¶ 20–23. Plaintiffs allege that …