Sekerke

Sekerke v. Olsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20233:20-cv-01045California5,726 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01045-JO-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S ADAM ARKWRIGHT, et al.,

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

Defendants. COUNSEL [ECF No. 52],

16 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SERVE

INTERROGATORIES

18 [ECF No. 53], and 19 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY

AND APPOINT EXPERT WITNESS [ECF No. 56] 22 Before the Court are three motions: 1. Plaintiff Keith Wayne Sekerke’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 52); 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Serve Interrogatories (ECF No. 53); and 3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen Discovery and Appoint Expert Witness (ECF No. 56). Defendant has indicated that it opposes the motions. ECF Nos. 54, 55, 61. The Court will address each in turn. I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Plaintiff, proceeding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.