Scripps Health v. Nautilus Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20233:21-cv-01634California915 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCRIPPS HEALTH, Case No.: 21-cv-01634-AJB-WVG Plaintiff, ORDER OVERRULING v. DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S JANUARY

NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY;

15, 2023 ORDER and DOES 1-20, inclusive,

Defendants. (Doc. No. 65) 16 Presently before the Court is Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company’s (“Nautilus”) objection to Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo’s order denying in part without prejudice and denying in part with prejudice the joint motion to take depositions of third-party witnesses after the fact discovery cut-off. (Doc. No. 65.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court finds the motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the Court OVERRULES Nautilus’ objection. I. BACKGROUND On January 15, 2023, Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo issued an order (“Order”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.