Inta

Inta v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20233:22-cv-00263California330 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 KHAMNGA INTA; RICHARD S. INTA, Case No. 22-cv-0263-BAS-DDL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 17)

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

Defendant. 18 19 20 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(a)(1) to dismiss the above-captioned action with prejudice. (Joint Mot., ECF No. 17.) Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its action by (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer or moved for summary judgment, or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal is effective upon the filing of a compliant notice or stipulation, as described in Rule 41(a)(1)(A), and no court order is |}required. Stone v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.