Parker

Parker v. Wells Fargo Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20233:22-cv-00819California643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY J. PARKER, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00819-RBM-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. WITHDRAWAL AS ATTORNEY OF

RECORD

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION, a United States 15 corporation; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, [Doc. 11] 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 On January 31, 2023, Warren Beck, counsel of record for Plaintiff Anthony J. Parker (“Plaintiff”), filed a motion to withdraw as counsel (“Motion”). (Doc. 11.) The Court finds the Motion procedurally proper pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.3(f)(3) as it has been served on Plaintiff and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”). (Id. at 6–7.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. DISCUSSION “An attorney may not withdraw as counsel except by leave of court.” Darby v. City of Torrance, 810 F. Supp. 275, 276 (C.D. Cal. 1992). “The decision to grant or deny counsel’s motion to withdraw is committed to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.