McCormack
McCormack v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 AMY MCCORMACK et al. )
) Case No.: 3:22-cv-00525-AJB-DDL ) Plaintiffs, ) CLASS ACTION ) 13 v. ) Order Dismissing Entire Action ) ) Without Prejudice Pursuant to STERLING JEWELERS, INC. et al. ) Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 15 ) Defendants. ) ) ) 17 ) )
27 The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this action without prejudice. All 2 || parties have agreed to the dismissal. In light of the stipulation, the case has been dismissed without prejudice pursuant 4|| to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); see also 5|| Ripley v. Bridgestone Retail Ops., LLC., No. C09-1482 RSM, 2010 WL 11684294, at * (W.D. Wash. Sept. 2, 2010) (citing Moore’s Federal Practice 3d, § 23.64[2][a] (2007)); see also Richey vy. GetWellNetwork, Inc., No. 20-cv-2205-BEN-BLM, 2021 8 || WL 424281, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2021) (“Because no class has been…