Heizelman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBET HEIZELMAN, Case No.: 22-cv-1676-GPC-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS; SUA SPONTE

CHASE BANK,

DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

Defendant. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

AND FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

MATTER JURISDICTION; AND

DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL AS MOOT

[ECF Nos. 2, 3]

20 On October 27, 2022, Plaintiff Robet Heizelman (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, 21 filed a Complaint against Defendant Chase Bank (“Defendant”). ECF No. 1. Plaintiff 22 concurrently filed a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and a Motion to 23 Appoint Counsel. ECF Nos. 2, 3. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s 24 Motion to Proceed IFP; sua sponte DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state 25 a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and for lack of subject matter 26 jurisdiction;…