Vertical Bridge Development, LLC v. Calexico City Council

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20233:21-cv-02097California2,097 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VERTICAL BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT, Case No.: 21-cv-2097-L-AHG

LLC,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, DISMISS SECOND AMENDED v. COMPLAINT

CALEXICO CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF

[ECF No. 27] CALEXICO, and DOES 1–5, 15 Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Calexico City Council and City of Calexico’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Vertical Bridge Development, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) second amended complaint. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff opposed, (ECF No. 29), and Defendants replied, (ECF No. 32). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. I. BACKGROUND According to the allegations in the second amended complaint, Plaintiff places, constructs, modifies, operates, and manages telecommunication infrastructure, including cell towers for cellular service providers. (ECF No. 24, at 4.) Plaintiff was hired to locate, construct, and manage a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.