Vertical Bridge Development, LLC v. Calexico City Council
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VERTICAL BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT, Case No.: 21-cv-2097-L-AHG
LLC,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
Plaintiff, DISMISS SECOND AMENDED v. COMPLAINT
CALEXICO CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF
[ECF No. 27] CALEXICO, and DOES 1–5, 15 Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Calexico City Council and City of Calexico’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Vertical Bridge Development, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) second amended complaint. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff opposed, (ECF No. 29), and Defendants replied, (ECF No. 32). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. I. BACKGROUND According to the allegations in the second amended complaint, Plaintiff places, constructs, modifies, operates, and manages telecommunication infrastructure, including cell towers for cellular service providers. (ECF No. 24, at 4.) Plaintiff was hired to locate, construct, and manage a…