Guiniling

Guiniling v. Escondido Medical Investors Limited Partnership Life Care Center of Escondido

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20233:22-cv-01208California2,251 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 GLORIA GUINILING, on behalf of Case No.: 22-cv-1208-L-KSC herself and all persons similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, REMAND v. 15 [ECF No. 7]

ESCONDIDO MEDICAL INVESTORS

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LIFE CARE

CENTER OF ESCONDIDO, and DOES 1–50, 18 Defendants. 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Gloria Guiniling’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand. (ECF No. 7.) Defendant Escondido Medical Investors Limited Partnership Life Care Center of Escondido (“Defendant”) opposed, (ECF No. 8), and Plaintiff replied, (ECF No. 7). The Court decides this matter on the papers without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7.1. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND According to the allegations in the complaint, (ECF No. 1-4), Plaintiff is a former non-exempt employee of Defendant in the state of California. Plaintiff originally filed this action in the San Diego Superior Court on behalf of herself and a class of “all 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.