Fierro

Fierro v. Capital One, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20233:22-cv-00493California4,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 PATRICIA FIERRO, Case No. 22-cv-00493-BAS-BLM

14 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED

CAPITAL ONE, N.A., COMPLAINT (ECF No. 19)

18 Defendant. 19 Presently before the Court is Defendant Capital One, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Patricia Fierro’s First Amended Complaint. (Mot., ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff opposes (Opp’n, ECF No. 20), and Defendant replies (Reply, ECF No. 21). The Court finds this Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion. 27 I. BACKGROUND The Court outlined Plaintiff’s allegations in its Order Granting in Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (Dismissal Order, ECF No. 11.) In short, Plaintiff 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.