Fierro
Fierro v. Capital One, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 PATRICIA FIERRO, Case No. 22-cv-00493-BAS-BLM
14 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED
CAPITAL ONE, N.A., COMPLAINT (ECF No. 19)
18 Defendant. 19 Presently before the Court is Defendant Capital One, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Patricia Fierro’s First Amended Complaint. (Mot., ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff opposes (Opp’n, ECF No. 20), and Defendant replies (Reply, ECF No. 21). The Court finds this Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion. 27 I. BACKGROUND The Court outlined Plaintiff’s allegations in its Order Granting in Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (Dismissal Order, ECF No. 11.) In short, Plaintiff 4 …