Roberts
Roberts v. Studio 15 Management
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, an individual, Case No.: 22-cv-967-GPC(AGH)
Plaintiff,
AMENDED ORDER DENYING
v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
STUDIO 15 MANGENT, RUTH
ON APPEAL
RIVERIA, JOLINDA QUILTIA,
14 Defendants. 15 [Dkt. No. 22.] 16 On August 18, 2022, the Court, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), sua sponte dismissed Plaintiff’s amended complaint for failure to state a claim without leave to amend because the complaint failed to present short and plain statements with legally relevant facts to support a cause of action. (Dkt. No. 15.) On January 19, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the Court’s order. (Dkt. No. 21.) Concurrently, she also filed a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal indicating she cannot pay the filing fee. (Dkt. No. 22.) Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3) provides that [a] party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district-
1 On August 4,…