McCoy

McCoy v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20233:22-cv-02075California1,021 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARBARA MCCOY, Case No.: 22-CV-2075 JLS (AGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER SETTING HEARING FOR

v. MOTION TO DISQUALIFY

PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT STEPHEN

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.;

LI AND TO DISCUSS CHOICE-OF-

DEPUY PRODUCTS, INC.;

LAW ISSUES

DEPUY SYNTHES, INC.;

JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JOHNSON (ECF Nos. 44, 60, 65, 66) & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.; and

JOHNSON & JOHNSON

INTERNATIONAL, Defendants.

Presently before the Court are the Parties’ Joint Status Report (ECF No. 60), the Parties’ Joint Proposed Case Management Schedule (ECF No. 65), and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler’s Scheduling Order (“Sched. Order,” ECF No. 66). Also before the Court are Defendants’ “Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff[’]s[] Expert[ ] Stephen Li” (“Li Mot.,” ECF No. 44), to which no opposition has been filed; the Parties’ motions to exclude certain experts’ opinions (ECF Nos. 40 & 41), to which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.